Is Ordering Knowingly False Information to be Entered into Court Records Fair, or Framing a Person? March 5, 2025

What limits are there on a Washington State judge? Is it lawful for a judge to knowingly order false and prejudicial information be added to court records without the false information being cross-examined or even reviewed? Is it lawful for a judge to impose excessive and redundant financial and time expenditures with no basis or law referenced? Who holds judges accountable to providing fair, just and equitable justice in Washington State?

During this hearing (audio here), a Washington resident and his attorney object to a report being added to the court record when 1) the court was informed that the report contains false information, 2) counsel has not been given adequate time to properly review the report and offer factual corrections, 3) the certifications of the group of people providing the report is unknown as the report was assigned to 4 people over more than 6 months, 4) the Judge has not seen or read the report, 5) no party understands what it literally says, and yet 6) the Judge orders immediate filing of the report within 3 hours by the end of the day and orders compliance with any and all recommendations, not knowing what it recommends.

Are U.S. and Washington State Constitutional rights protected by any organization or individual in King County and Washington? Does the Judge in this hearing seem like he's blindly assigning guilt and ordering unknown consequences after being informed by an Officer of the Court, that the individual creating the report and report itself are of questionable credibility at best? The attorney states she has not had time to review the report due to an emergency, and has seen numerous factual errors in the brief time that she has had to read a piece of the report.